Businessman moves forward for a State Senate run!

Businessman moves forward for a State Senate run!

Clark County Nevada

July 13, 2021

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Joshua Dowden a candidate for Nevada’s State Senate District 8.

Dowden 22 year resident of Nevada, a single father raising his children majority on his own.

Nevada’s 8th Senate district is one of 21 districts in the Nevada Senate. It has been represented by Democrat Marilyn Dondero Loop since 2018, succeeding Republican-turned-independent Patricia Farley.

As of the 2010 census, a total of 128,218 civilians reside within Nevada’s eighth state senate district. Nevada state senators represent an average of 128,598 residents as of the 2010 Census.

Below click onto Joshua Dowden for State Senate:

Home

 

Please click on the link below to view the video interview:

Joshua Dowden for Nevada State Senate District 8 on Veterans In Politics Internet Radio Talk show

 

Past election interview of Joshua Dowden:

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 11, VETERANS IN POLITICS INTERNATIONAL ENDORSEMENT INTERVIEWS

 

Court Corner

On July 13, 2021, Veterans In Politics Court Observers Burke Hall and Steve Sanson were invited to observe the court hearing of Fields vs. Brower before Bryce Duckworth Clark County Family Court Judge. The father represented himself and the mother represented by Louis Schneider Nevada Attorney. It was the father’s motion who was not present. The father now resides in California. The mother was present in the courtroom and her attorney was present by Blue Jeans video. Duckworth dismissed the father’s motion and awarded the mother attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,000. Duckworth cited the father for failure to appear and indicated that according to the court order signed by the last judge on the case Rebecca Burton, which the father can only appear in person. The parents recently lost one of their children to cancer.

Read More –>

Combat Veteran was denied seen his children for a decade by Family Court!

Combat Veteran was denied seen his children for a decade by Family Court!

Clark County Nevada

July 9, 2021

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Juan Rivera Marine Combat Veteran explained passionately how the family court system robbed him of 10 years of seeing his children.

Rivera explained how the system illegally stole 10 years from him being a father to his children.

Rivera who served his country in the Marine Corps defending this country in combat explained by doing this he defended a corrupt system.

Yes, Veterans are affected by a corrupt family court system. We are not immune to this, so let’s stand tall to have a fair judiciary in our family court system.

Please click on the video link below to view:

Juan Rivera Marine Veteran to discuss family court on the Veterans In Politics Video talk-show

www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBdnZ4a4-N8&t=2315s

 

VETERANS Join the Class-Action Lawsuit

veteransinpolitics.org/2021/06/veterans-join-our-class-action-lawsuit/

Veterans In Politics International has teamed up with 3M justice and filed a Tort Litigation for compensation for Veterans that have hearing issues. It will cost you nothing to add your name to the Class-Action lawsuit and get the compensation you deserve.

Please click on the link below: www.military3mclaims.com/vip/

Please click on the link below to view:

Brad Weitman discusses the class action lawsuit on 3 M hearing products in support of Veterans

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcAGk4BK33A&t=120s

Read More –>

A complete education on Marijuana usages and benefits!

A complete education on Marijuana usages and benefits!

 

Clark County Nevada

June 27, 2021

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Ron Andolina Plant Manager for Biopharma given us an education on marijuana usages and benefits.

Andolina informed us on the testing, statistics, medical, usages, comparison, THC, CBD, Delta 8, growing and so much more. After watching the interview below you to would appreciate marijuana.

Please click on the link below to view the video interview:

Ron Andolina Plant Manager Biopharma discussing the usage of marijuana on the Veterans In Politics

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s7fnu5GNrI

 

Building Tent Cities to avoid homelessness amongst our veterans!

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed James Bayliss said that there is no need for veterans to be homeless, all we have to do is build a Tent City.

Please click on the link below to view the video interview:

James Bayliss long term help for Veterans on the Veterans In Politics Video Internet talk-show

www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0CGTXqSzcI

 

 

 

Help to Family Court Litigants:

Veterans In Politics and the Clark County Department of Family Services (CCDFS) have been in contact with each other to better serve pro-se-litigants in Family Court.

Attached is a guide for parents (it’s also available in Spanish), it captures information you need to know about the CCDFS and the various programs they have.  Below is the link to the CCDFS website for more information.  Also includes is the link to the Ombudsman Program.  CCDFS strongly encourages individuals that have questions or concerns about their current case to start there.

Parents’ Guide

www.clarkcountynv.gov/residents/family_services/index.php

Ombudsman Program

www.clarkcountynv.gov/government/county_managers_office/ombudsman/index.php

Read More –>

New Observations on Sole and Joint Custody for Children

Is joint custody problematic? A child psychiatrist shares observations from 40 years of child custody work as to why sole custody works better for children.

Read More –>

Family Court Litigants tell tails of horror to Clark County Commissioners!

Family Court Litigants tell tails of horror to Clark County Commissioners!

Clark County Nevada

June 18, 2021

On June 15, 2021, one by one Clark County Family Court Litigants tells tails of horror at the hands of Family Court Judges at the Clark County Board of County Commissioners in Public Comments (see link: clark.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=28&clip_id=7110).

Jason D’Souza talks about how he has no abuse to his child, but yet he has a lifetime restraining order against his child (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m3jCl25F7U).

Jason D’Souza speaks before the Clark County Commission on the corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m3jCl25F7U

 

Laure Muncy said she came to family court seeking relief and end up worse off and her finances have disappeared (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2lcyBOje_8).

Laure Muncy speaks before the Clark County Commission on the corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2lcyBOje_8

 

Jennifer Bandiero explained how her ex abandoned her and her children. Her daughters had many medical issues included but not limited to urinary tract infections, broken bones, and tested positive for methamphetamines in the father’s care but yet both Clark County Child Protection Services and Family Court Judge Cheryl Moss look the other way. Bandiero continues to say she spent over $200,000 on attorneys to protect her children and got nowhere (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPK4LeLcCrM).

Jennifer Bandiero speaks before the Clark County Commission on corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPK4LeLcCrM

 

Kaylee Hollenbaugh spoke about how the courts alienated her from her son at the hands of Family Court Judge Linda Marquis who ordered custody of her child to none biological person. She ended by saying parental alienation is not in the best interest of her child (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YO-pjjpU8E).

Kaylee Hollenbaugh speaks before Clark County Commission on corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YO-pjjpU8E&t=47s

 

T. Matthew Phillips a licensed California attorney speaks about the crises in family court. Phillips indicated how he has not communicated with his son in almost 3 years and he has done nothing to his son to deserve this punishment. Phillips continues and talks about how Family Court Judge Mathew Harter violated both bankruptcy and mortgage laws including perjury but yet all state agencies that he has filed a complaint with did absolutely nothing and explains how criminals get to sit on the bench to judge litigants. While he continues to live with the nightmare of not seeing his son (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVF0qNMW7eM).

T. Matthew Phillips speaks before the Clark County Commission on Corrupt Mathew Harter Family Court

www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVF0qNMW7eM

 

Sandra Cosey a school teacher for over 20 years speaks about how Family Court Judge Linda Marquis refuses to follow the law and the rule of evidence. Cosey continues by saying this type of judge causes emotional and financial distress. Cosey said she left her domestic abuser just to be re-victimized by the family court. In addition, she indicated that her domestic abuser violated the court orders and Judge Marquis refuses to enforce the order and told her not to come to court over petty arguments (see video testimony: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH7-_espuZg).

Sandra Cosey speaks before the Clark County Commission on the corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH7-_espuZg

 

Burke Hall a combat veteran speaks how he protected our country and his country has failed his children. Hall speaks about how the mother of his children killed the couple’s 2-year-old son in front of his remaining 4 and 6-year-old sons. Hall continues and said his remaining children were placed with the Clark County Department of Family Services and were raped while being in their custody. Hall said his case was overseen by Family Court Judge Sandra Pomrenze who denied him custody of his reaming sons and awarded the children to the mother, a convicted felon. Hall continues by saying Family Court Judge Mathew Harter who ruled and ordered on a case that he is not a party of and made an order against him not giving him the right to defend himself. Hall also said that Judge Harter told a litigant in family court that he is GOD! (See video testimony www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVXc5EWI-o&t=5s).

Burke Hall speaks before the Clark County Commission on the corruption in the Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVXc5EWI-o&t=5s

 

Steve Sanson President of Veterans In Politics indicated that the travesty in Family Court has to end. Sanson said that the Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission (NJDC) is supposed to be a buffer between the Judge and the Public and they are underfunded. To save face when you file a complaint with the agency, they immediately denied an investigation for some made-up findings just so you could go away. Sanson also added that he is not a litigant in family court and he is only involved because it’s the right thing to do (see video testimony www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh4UriWgopw&t=198s).

Steve Sanson speaks before Clark County Commission on lack of accountability in Family Court System

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh4UriWgopw&t=198s

This is just a handful of thousands of litigants that are abused by a system we call justice!

Read More –>

JENNIFER ABRAMS SETTLES with SANSON—for $155K! DATELINE:

JENNIFER ABRAMS SETTLES with SANSON—for $155K! DATELINE:

Clark County Nevada

June 11, 2021

 

Las Vegas, Nev., (June 4, 2021). The newsflash, apparently official, Jennifer Abrams has paid $155,000 to settle-up with Steve Sanson and Veterans In Politics, International (“VIPI”).

ABRAMS SETTLES for $155K

Moments ago, our editorial staff learned that local attorney, Jennifer V. Abrams, and the Abrams & Mayo Law Firm recently entered into a settlement agreement with Steve Sanson and VIPI. The Abrams Parties agreed to pay $155,000 to resolve the parties’ ongoing litigation.

Our editorial staff was informed that Abrams and her firm have already paid the settlement in full—$155k.

We presume the lion’s share of the $155k will go to the lawyers.

The lawsuit is continuing in district court. Louis Schneider a Nevada Attorney remains as a defendant. After the Nevada Supreme Court almost entirely upheld the district court’s prior decision to grant an anti-SLAPP motion, Schneider sought fees and costs and dismiss the remaining claims. Those motions are still pending.

SANSON SPEAKS!

Our editorial staff spoke with Steve Sanson, who explained that the settlement agreement has no confidentiality clause. “Well, Abrams wanted confidentiality, but I said, NO!” explains Sanson, “This is about freedom of speech and I took an oath to defend the Constitution along with our fundamental liberty interests in freedom of speech. This case started with Jennifer Abrams suing to silence me and the public has an interest in knowing what happens in anti-SLAPP cases.”

THE BACKSTORY

Abrams is a controversial divorce attorney—who some see as emblematic of the chronic problems that plague the family court. Employees of Abrams’ law office run a Facebook hater group where they openly taunt and bully parents fighting for custody.

Sanson criticized Abrams’ sketchy courtroom conduct. Then Abrams retaliated—by filing a defamation lawsuit against Sanson, VIPI , and all its officers! (Holy guacamole!)

But Abrams’ defamation lawsuit was baseless. Abrams had no likelihood of prevailing on her specious defamation claim (and she knew it). Instead, it seemed that Abrams calculated her lawsuit for one purpose—chilling Sanson’s speech-related activities.

Abrams thought her defamation lawsuit would shut down Sanson’s criticisms of her shady courtroom conduct. But Abrams never counted on the indomitable fighting spirit of a United States Marine! “OO-rah!”

In response to Abrams’ half-stepping defamation lawsuit, Steve Sanson countered with an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss—and Abrams got knocked out! It was epic! Sanson handed Abrams a stunning upset defeat! Much like the Lakers victory over the Supersonics back in 1989!

THE LITIGATION

It was long, arduous litigation. Abrams lost in the trial court, then she appealed, but again, she (almost entirely) lost. It wasn’t even a valiant fight. It was just sad. Some legal observers speculate on whether Abrams was stubbornly prolonging her inevitable defeat—trying to prove a point. If so, the only point is that Abrams paid $155,000 (ouch!). Sanson showed himself to be a noble defender of First Amendment liberties!

In the court, Steve Sanson and VIPI established proved that his criticisms of Abrams’ courtroom conduct are free speech—protected by the First Amendment! This means that Sanson has a constitutional right to criticize Abrams—regardless of whether she is offended! Sanson’s triumph over Abrams was a ginormous victory for free speech enthusiasts nationwide!

Sanson added, “I am glad the Nevada Supreme Court correctly ruled that an attorney’s courtroom conduct is a matter of public interest, which we can discuss publicly! With all due respect to Ms. Abrams, she must learn to accept criticisms—especially when they’re valid.”

“And, I’d like to thank my lawyer, Maggie, McLetchie—a heavy hitter—a First Amendment guru—who always had faith in me,” says Sanson who added, “and I wish to thank her associates, the hard-working  Leo Wolpert, and  Alina Shell. Without these talented individuals, this landmark decision would not have been possible! I also want to give a shout-out to Anat Levy who always has my back!”

LEGAL SHOCK-WAVES

The Nevada Supreme Court ruling in Abrams vs. Sanson has sent shockwaves through the corridors of legal power statewide! The high court precedent is clear and unambiguous. The Nevada Supreme Court wholeheartedly supports free speech!

The VIPI editorial staff spoke with our legal correspondent, T. Matthew Phillips, a First Amendment aficionado, who explained, “What we do in life—echoes in eternity.” Phillips added, “When Carson City enacted our state’s anti-SLAPP statutes, they had in mind Jenny Abrams’ frivolous lawsuit against Steve Sanson.

Justice was served!”

We were also fortunate to speak with a world-renowned constitutional expert, Maggie McLetchie, who told our staff, “I’m pleased the parties were able to reach an amicable resolution.”

EPILOGUE

“She sued me to stifle my free speech,” says Sanson, “and the reason she tried to stifle my free speech was to hide her own misconduct.” Sanson added, “If you see something, say something, right? So, I see a shyster lawyer, I say something … she files a shyster lawsuit … she gets slapped out of the water! $155 thousand smackeroos! Cha-Ching! Thank you, please come again!”

Our editorial team wondered whether there’s any legal insight that this litigation may offer—as a learning experience. T. Matthew Phillips explained, “Never underestimate your opponent.” Phillips reminds us, “That’s straight outta Sun-Tzu! Jenny Abrams underestimated a tough-as-nails United States Marine, who basically opened a can of whoop-ass with a side o’ fries and a triple-thick chocolate shake!”

THE WILLICK FACTOR

Note also, the legal battle rages on between Sanson and Marshal Willick another divorce attorney. Remarkably, Willick pulled the same stunt as his girlfriend, fiancée, wife (who knows) Jenny Abrams. And, like his girlfriend, Sanson served up a “how-do-you-do!” Willick now back-peddles, desperately trying to dismiss his own lawsuit against Sanson.

Stay tuned!

VETERANS in POLITICS INTERNATIONAL (“Where Change Happens!”)

Please click on the link below to view Saturday’s show: Tahra Violet self-healing on the Veterans In Politics Video Internet talk-show

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqjZwuTykcg&t=209s

Read More –>

NO FREE RIDE for HARTER!!

NO FREE RIDE for HARTER!!

On April 5, 2021, a federal lawsuit was filed by Ali Shahrokhi and T. Matthew Phillips against family court judge, Mathew Harter.  [Shahrokhi, et.al. vs. Harter, 2:21-cv-00557-APG-BNW].

The lawsuit seeks a court order removing Harter from the bench—for violating Plaintiffs’ 14th Amendment right to expect a “fair judiciary.”

This federal lawsuit against Harter alleges that the 14th Amendment guarantees the people’s fundamental right to expect a “fair judiciary”—the cornerstone of democracy.  However, where judges commit crimes—such as fraud and perjury—there can be no “fair judiciary.”

Harter must go!

The lawsuit alleges that Harter committed bankruptcy fraud, perjury, and concealment of assets; and, because of these crimes, Harter’s mere presence on the bench “offends traditional notions of a fair judiciary,” which violates Plaintiffs’ federally protected rights under the 14th Amendment.

HARTER GETS a FREE RIDE

In this federal lawsuit, the Nevada Attorney General represents Harter—for free.  But Plaintiffs challenge this free legal representation!

Harter should have to pay for his own lawyers!

First of all, the Nevada Attorney General (A.G.) has already denied Veterans In Politics International’s complaint about an investigation against Harter, concerning the bankruptcy indiscretions, therefore, the A.G. is now conflicted-out.

The A.G. is in no position to represent Harter concerning allegations of Bankruptcy fraud because the representation creates blatant conflicts of interest.

The A.G. should NOT represent Harter and for two reasons—(a) Harter committed bankruptcy fraud and the people should not have to pay to defend his conduct, and (b) Harter is being sued for conduct “off the bench,” and because the operative acts occurred “off the bench,” Harter is not entitled to a state-paid attorney.

What does the law say?

Well, it says that Harter is entitled to a state-paid lawyer in lawsuits “based on any alleged act or omission relating to the person’s public duties or employment,” [NRS § 41.0339].

So, did Harter’s BK filing relate to Harter’s public duties or employment?  No!  Therefore, no free ride for Harter.

In addition, there must be a determination that the acts in question happened in “good faith,” [NRS § 41.0339].  But Harter cannot show good faith—because he committed “fraud” in the bankruptcy court!

MOTION to DISQUALIFY

Plaintiffs Shahrokhi and Phillips made a motion to disqualify Harter’s attorneys-of-record, i.e., Nevada Attorney General’s Office.  This motion is now pending before a federal judge.

Plaintiffs argue that the A.G. must be disqualified because the acts that give rise to the lawsuit—Harter’s personal bankruptcy—did not arise within the scope of Harter’s employment as a judge.  In addition, Harter’s personal bankruptcy (obviously) came in “bad faith,” [NRS § 41.0339.1(b)].

Remarkably, the A.G. argues that the state may represent Harter because his B.K. filing, “relates to [Harter’s] public duties or employment.”  But this argument is absurd!  The A.G. argues that bankruptcy is part of a judge’s official duties!

Judges have duties to file bankruptcies?  (Who knew?)   Perhaps the federal court will once-and-for-all resolve the thorny issue of whether filing bankruptcy is part of a judge’s official duties (or not).

BEST INTERESTS of THE STATE

The A.G. next argues that the state may represent state-court judges when representation is in the best interests of the state, [NRS 228.170(1)].  The A.G. told the court that the defense of Harter is in the best interests of the State of Nevada.  But Plaintiffs wonder—how is defending Harter in the best interests of the state?

According to the A.G., “Nevada has an interest in protecting its judicial officers from being bankrupted by means of having to defend civil lawsuits brought by disgruntled former litigants.”  Oh, how ironic!—The A.G. worries about Harter going bankrupt?!  No worries.  HARTER won’t again be eligible to pull another bankruptcy until 2024.

Does the A.G. ever worry about the countless families that Harter bankrupts?

Plaintiff, T. Matthew Phillips stated:  “Harter’s BK was on his own personal time, therefore, attorney’s fees must be funded on his own personal dime.  Get it?”

Plaintiff Ali Shahrokhi was direct:  “It is a waste of public funds.  He must pay for his own attorney.  Does the state give Harter a free lawyer if Harter is in a car accident driving to the movies on Saturday night?  Attorney General must be disqualified.”

However, the A.G. refuses to quit as Harter’s attorney!  The state’s managing attorney is none other than Steve Shevorski who, much like Tom Petty, just “Won’t Back Down.”  Shevorski insists there is no conflict of interest and that the B.K. filing was part of Harter’s public duties and therefore, Harter is entitled to a free, state-paid attorney.

EPILOGUE

Harter committed bankruptcy fraud—in plain view of the general public—and under the nose of a federal judge.  Harter survived complaints to the U.S. Trustee’s Office, the Commission on Judicial Discipline, and the Nevada Attorney General. Recently Veterans In Politics International filed another complaint, this time with the Nevada Commission on Ethics, lets see if they joined the crowd to protect a judge that commits a criminal act.

Harter continues to sit on the bench in judgment of others.

As long as Harter remains on the bench, there can be no “fair judiciary” in Nevada.  Stay tuned for the results of the motion to disqualify the A.G. as Harter’s attorney.

Please click on the video testimony before the Clark County Board of County Commissioners:

Mathew Harter Clark County District Court Judge Family Division is a Criminal on the Bench!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVYGM64r_wM&t=1s

VETERANS IN POLITICS INT’L (“Where Change Happens!”)

Read More –>

Briana Johnson Clark County Assessor hands-on working knowledge of the Department!

Briana Johnson Clark County Assessor hands-on working knowledge of the Department!

Clark County Nevada

May 29, 2021

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Briana Johnson Clark County Assessor.

The election year 2022 is right around the corner. On the ballot will be the Clark County Assessor.

Johnson a Las Vegas Native graduated from UNLV with a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration. Johnson has been in the Assessor’s Office for over 26 years and excelled through the ranks.

Johnson has a hands-on working knowledge of the entire Assessor’s Office.

Office of the Clark County Assessor:

The Assessor values all property subject to taxation. The Assessor is required by Nevada law to discover, list, and value all property within the County. The property is assessed at 35% of its current appraised value. In addition to the parcels of real property (land, homes, commercial buildings), the Assessor must value personal property including businesses from lavish multi-million dollar casinos to one-person operations, manufactured homes, aircraft, and any other personal property which is taxable. The Assessor collects personal property tax only as of the ex-officio treasurer of the County.

About the Clark County Assessor:

Briana Johnson was elected Clark County Assessor on November 6, 2018.  Prior to being elected, she proudly served the public for over 26 years in the Assessor’s Office.  She started in 1995 and held various positions in the Appraisal Division, including Manager of Property Appraisal, prior to being promoted to Assistant Director of Assessment Services in 2016.

As Assessor, Briana Johnson oversees the daily operations of the Office and the assessment of approximately 775,000 parcels, 25,000 manufactured homes, and 45,000 businesses in Clark County.  In addition, she supervises the processing of approximately 80,000 exemptions for the Blind, Veterans, and Surviving Spouses.

Johnson is a native of Las Vegas who graduated from Valley High School.  Johnson later graduated from the University of Nevada Las Vegas and received her Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration.  Briana Johnson holds a Property Tax Appraiser Certificate in both real and personal property from the State of Nevada.

Johnson’s professional affiliations include the International Association of Assessing Officers and the Nevada Assessors Association.  Johnson is also a member of Toastmasters International.

Please click on the links below to be informed:

Clark County Assessor:

www.clarkcountynv.gov/government/assessor/about.php

Click on the video:

Briana Johnson Clark County Assessor on the Veterans In Politics Video Internet talk-show.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb-1r0nf-js&t=205s

 

Citizens Review Board is a Board of “CLOWNS”

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Giano Amado Judicial Activist.

Amado has been championing legislative reform because of the tremendous corruption that has plagued the family court system. Amado was motivated by the corruption at the hands of Mathew Harter Clark County Family Court Judge.

Amado would like to eliminate qualified immunity, Amado discussed his victory from the Nevada Supreme Court when he received an order for Reversal and Remand on June 29, 2020, against Harter.

In addition, Amado also received a Disqualification from the Nevada Supreme Court because of bias reasons again, against Judge Harter in November 2020.

Amado said that Judge Harter has destroyed his daughter’s life and the lives of his family that he can never get back.

Amado went before the Las Vegas City Council requesting that we form a Public Citizens Review Board to oust corrupt elected officials.

Amado state that the LVMPD Citizens Review Board is a “Circus” that is there to protect corrupt police officers and not the citizens they have violated.

Click on the video:

Giano Amado will discuss the need for a Public Citizen Review Board to oust a corrupt elected official

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dze3SAost3U&t=319s

 

Steve Sanson President of Veterans In Politics request a major overhaul of the LVMPD Citizens Review Board before the Las Vegas City Council

Click on the video:

Sanson President of Veterans In Politics request a major overhaul of the LVMPD Citizens Review Board

www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5LSb0ZPLB4&t=56s

Jac Lindell

Many years ago I was appointed to the citizen’s review board but after my 1st hearing (which resulted in metro revising their policy based on my recommendation) I kept from hearing further cases for applying common sense and my refusal to wear a shirt and tie….. the ides of a board is great, the lady that runs it needs to go and people with some background or at least common sense need to serve on board…. when I am stopped I always disclose I have a CCW and where my weapon is (right front pocket) because I know the officer may not have run scope on me when he pulled me over and as you say to get a CCW I had to pass an extensive background search and I am told no one with a CCW permit has ever committed a crime with their weapon…. that cop needed a reprimand at the least.

Read More –>

Civil Rights Attorneys should focus on Family Court!

Civil Rights Attorneys should focus on Family Court!

 

Where the Rule of Evidence does not apply!

 

Clark County Nevada

April 28, 2021

 

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Megan and Jason Snow as they discuss numerous Civil Rights violations in a Clark County Family Courtroom.

Jason Snow married Megan Snow both live in the same household. Jason Snow has been a step-father to his wife’s daughter for the past five years.

Megan Snow is deemed a vexatious litigant preventing her from defending herself and fighting for her child. This same hypocritical rule does not apply to overzealous attorneys who file tons of documents just to increase attorney’s fees on both sides.

Megan Snow is not allowed to file any more paperwork on her case, custody modification is to be removed from her vocabulary, and if she does file for modification she would be “sanctioned” so ordered by Family Court Judge Soonhee “Sunny” Bailey.

What happened to the right to a fair trial?

Jason Snow has to leave his home for two days when his wife Megan Snow has visitation with her daughter. Jason Snow has to find somewhere else to live every Thursday and Friday since 2018, leaving his wife, his biological 3-year-old son with Megan Snow and his step-daughter.

It’s alright for Jason Snow to live with his 3-year-old biological son, but it’s not alright for him to be around his 7-year-old step-daughter, just because Megan Snow’s ex does not like Jason Snow.

There is absolutely no reason why Jason Snow should be removed from his home when his step-daughter arrives for her court-ordered visitation. With no end in sight. Is this in the best interest of the child?!

Where is the ACLU?

The US Constitution is eliminated in Clark County Family Courts.

A Congressional Investigation and a Federal lawsuit have to be in place because our local government has failed voters in family court.

Just when you believe you have heard everything. Listen to this explosive interview.

Megan & Jason Snow discuss Civil Rights Violations in family court on Veterans In Politics Talk

www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGq0CcPx254

Read More –>

FEDERAL LAWSUIT FILED against CLARK COUNTY JUDGE

FEDERAL LAWSUIT FILED against CLARK COUNTY JUDGE

Clark County Nevada

April 8, 2021

 

On April 5, 2021, a federal lawsuit was filed against family court judge, Mathew Harter.  [Shahrokhi, et.al. vs. Harter, 2:21-cv-00557-APG-BNW].  The lawsuit seeks a court order removing Harter from the bench—for violating Plaintiffs’ 14th Amendment right to expect a “fair judiciary.”

GROUNDBREAKING LAWSUIT

The lawsuit contends that the 14th Amendment guarantees the people’s fundamental right to expect a “fair judiciary,” and, where judges commit crimes—such as fraud and perjury—there can be no “fair judiciary.”

The lawsuit alleges that Harter committed bankruptcy fraud, perjury, and concealment of assets; and, because of these crimes, Harter’s mere presence on the bench “offends traditional notions of a fair judiciary,” which violates Plaintiffs’ 14th Amendment rights.

According to Plaintiff, Ali Shahrokhi, “We have no hope in family court—especially when we see a family court judge get away with fraud and perjury—and still remain on the bench—to sit in judgment on others—operating a cash-for-kids operation.  It is beyond disgusting how they think they can violate our constitutional rights under the color of law.  I refuse to allow thieves to affect my son’s life.”

The lawsuit alleges that Harter’s mere presence on the bench is a “daily reminder of the pall of corruption that hangs over Clark County courts.”  The lawsuit demands that “Harter must go.”

JUDICIAL COMMISSION DROPS the BALL

In fall 2020, Veteran In Politics, Int’l, (VIPI), filed a complaint with Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline.  However, on Jan. 19, 2021, the Commission denied the VIPI complaint—citing the statute of limitations.

But Commission attorney, Paul Dehley, misunderstands the statute of limitations.  According to the lawsuit, the statute of limitations may have expired on Harter’s failure to “comply with the law,” [NCJC Rule 1.1], however, the statute of limitations never expires on Harter’s “appearance of impropriety,” [NCJC Rule 1.2].

Co-Plaintiff, T. Matthew Phillips, explains: “Yeah, Harter’s failure to comply with the law may now be a stale-dated ethical violation, however, the sun never sets on Harter’s appearance of impropriety.”

EFFORTS to REMOVE HARTER

Veterans in Politics, Int’l, for some time, has been trying to remove Harter from the bench.  But it has proved a daunting task.

Unfortunately, “recall” is not an option because the Nevada Supreme Court—in the name of “job security”—declares that the People cannot recall judges.

Veterans in Politics, Int’l, recently lodged a complaint with Nevada Attorney General, Aaron Ford.  But sadly, Aaron Ford refused to act making claims in a generic letter that was not part of the complaint.

The U.S. Trustee’s Office was made aware of Harter’s bankruptcy fraud; however, for reasons not entirely clear, the U.S. Trustee fails to act.

Despite multiple complaints to state and federal agencies, Harter still sits on the bench.  But how can this be?  Is Harter super well-connected?  Or is Clark County corruption so pervasive that no gov’t official can legitimately point a finger at Harter?

HARTER’S BANKRUPTCY

On Dec. 21, 2015, Mathew Harter, (and his wife, Brandie P. Harter), filed for Ch. 7 bankruptcy in U.S. District Court, Las Vegas, [Public Case No. 15-17012-LEB].

According to the lawsuit—

  • Harter submitted a fraudulent income statement to the bankruptcy court, falsely declaring an income of $-0-;
  • Harter committed perjury in his income statement to the bankruptcy court, lying about his monthly income;
  • Harter failed to disclose to the U.S. Trustee that he had come into possession of a single-family home worth over $300,000;
  • Harter committed mortgage fraud on a V.A. home loan.

Harter committed bankruptcy fraud in “plain view” of the general public—and under the nose of a federal judge.  One shudders to imagine the biting atrocities that take place in the private sphere of Harter’s tortured courtroom—where sealed family court cases lay beyond public scrutiny.

On a more somber note, should the reader pause to consider, where public officials are underwater in their personal finances, it makes them more susceptible to bribery.

BILLBOARD CAMPAIGN

VIPI member, Giano Amado recently disqualified Harter from his own family law case in the Nevada Supreme Court case# 81098-COA and 79122-COA NV.  (“OO-rah!”)  Determined to remove Harter from the bench, Amado and Veterans In Politics sponsored several billboards shedding light on Harter’s notorious bankruptcy fraud.  These billboards caused a public outcry and made a tremendous impact on public opinion.

Phillips explained: “Harter’s continued presence on the bench is a prolonged insult, a gob of spit in the face of parents, a kick in the pants to truth, justice, and the American way.”

STATUTE of LIMITATIONS

The statute of limitations for bankruptcy fraud and perjury is five (5) years, [18 U.S.C. § 3282].  However, where debtors conceal assets, the 5-year limitations period begins to run on the date the court grants discharge, [18 U.S.C. § 3284].  In Harter’s bankruptcy, the discharge happened in Nov. 2016—which means the statute of limitations on “concealment of assets” will not expire until Nov. 2021—which means it’s not too late to indict Harter.

THE STAIN of JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

The lawsuit alleges that Harter “violates every moral precept of what it means to be a judge.”

Plaintiff Shahrokhi stated, “I came to America from Iran for constitutional freedoms, not a bottom-feeder judge to decide how I and my son live our lives.  I don’t need a bankrupt, criminal to decide my son’s future.  I am a fit parent and I decide what takes place in my son’s life.”  Shahrokhi added, “That man does not deserve to be called “Your Honor.”

Steve Sanson President of Veterans In Politics International stated the following: “It’s a shame that our own state and local government cannot and will not protect the public from this type of behavior in our judiciary. Instead protects each other and screw the voters who put them in office.”

Other Related Articles:

Judge Committed Fraud on Bankruptcy Filings!

veteransinpolitics.org/2019/12/judge-committed-fraud-on-bankruptcy-filings/

Criminal Judge-committed Fraud & Perjury, nobody bats an eye!

veteransinpolitics.org/2020/12/criminal-judge-committed-fraud-perjury-nobody-bats-an-eye/

A CORRUPT JUDGE IS A GREAT VERMIN!!

veteransinpolitics.org/2020/09/a-corrupt-judge-is-a-great-vermin/

 

VETERAN in POLITICS INTERNATIONAL – “Where Change Happens”

Read More –>