October 15, 2019 meeting of the Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council 1

October 15, 2019 meeting of the Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council

October 15, 2019 meeting of the Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council

The council will oversees and regulates the Texas State Board of Examiners of Marriage and Family Therapists, Texas State Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors, Texas State Board of Social Worker Examiners, and the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists.

v. Dr. Alissa Sherry; Alissa Sherry Consulting, PLLC; Legal Consensus, Travis County Texas

Burnet County violations of Due Process, Civil Rights by Judge Linda Bayless


Download Here:

_Mandamus Burnet Co Judge Bayless with Exhibits_merged_filemarked


See all Posts Here: family-court-corruption.com/category/judge-linda-bayless/

Mandamus against Judge Linda Bayless, Burnet County for violations of Due Process, Civil Rights and for failing to Recuse herself


Download Here:

_Mandamus Burnet Co Judge Bayless with Exhibits_merged_filemarked


ISSUE NO 1
THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO NOTIFY THE RESPONDENT OF IT’S INTENT TO ENTER FINAL ORDERS AND NO MOTION FOR FINAL ORDER HAD BEEN ENTERED.

ISSUE NO 2
THE TRIAL COURT RECEIVED PROPOSED FINAL ORDERS EX-PARTE FROM OPPOSING COUNSEL. THE TRIAL COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL FAILED TO INCLUDE RESPONDENT IN COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING ITS INTENT OR DESIRE TO ENTER FINAL ORDERS.


ISSUE NO 3
THE DAY AFTER THE TRIAL COURT RECEIVED THE EX PARTE PROPOSED FINAL ORDERS FROM THE PETITIONERS ATTORNEY THE TRIAL COURT SIGNED AND ENTERED THOSE FINAL ORDERS IN HER CHAMBERS WITHOUT A HEARING DEC 1ST, 2017.

ISSUE NO 4
THERE WAS NO NOTICE TO THE PRO SE RESPONDENT AFTER THE FINAL ORDERS WERE ENTERED.


ISSUE NO 5
TRIAL COURT HAS REFUSED MULTIPLE REQUESTS FOR A HEARING OR A DECISION ON THE BILL OF REVIEW THAT WAS FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AND THE JUDGE HAS STATED TO BOTH RESPONDENTS AND PETITIONERS ATTORNEYS THAT SHE IS GOING TO DENY THE BILL OF REVIEW WITHOUT A HEARING. THE TRIAL JUDGE HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT SHE WILL PUT THE RESPONDENT IN JAIL FOR 6 MONTHS AND ONLY ALLOW HER SUPERVISED VISITATION OF HER CHILD IF SHE CONTINUES TO PURSUE THE BILL OF REVIEW TO CORRECT THE ERRORS OF THE COURT.

ISSUE NO 6
THE TRIAL COURT IMPROPERLY DETERMINED THE PUNISHMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF THE CASE DEPRIVING APPELLANT OF SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS AND HER DETERMINATIONS OF THIS PUNISHMENT WAS FROM INFORMATION OBTAINED OUTSIDE OF ANY COURT SETTING AND WITHOUT A HEARING.

ISSUE NO 7
JUDGE BAYLESS REFUSED TO RECUSE HERSELF WHEN THERE WAS MORE THAN SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVE A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS AND UNQUESTIONABLE BIAS


 

 

See all Posts Here: family-court-corruption.com/category/judge-linda-bayless/

Travis County Texas Family Court Corruption 2

Travis County Texas Family Court Corruption

Travis County Texas Family Court Corruption

Victims discuss Domestic Violence by Proxy, Abusive Litigation, Parents Being Unnecessarily Denied Access to Their Children, and other important topics:

Host Mike Lee and guests discuss the problems and challenges caused by legal and other professionals of the family law legal complex. They shared personal and professional experiences of the participants and reveal that more problems may be created rather than solved by these professionals. The discussion will suggest that financial gain and self-interest rather than the best interests of the children drive the reality of family law legal injustice. These complexities often negate the best interests of the children.

If you have issues that you feel are unjustified or corrupt please email txfamilycourtcorruption@gmail.com

Professionals of interest are:

Dr Alissa Sherry / Legal Consensus

LEGAL CONSENSUS (Alissa Sherry) V. BACCUS – Travis County Texas

anger_iceberg

Parental Alienation: Anger and Assumptions

Parental Alienation: Anger and Assumptions

anger_iceberg

Copyright 2017 by Monika Logan, M.A., LPC, LSOTP

Human beings tend to make assumptions about the world around us and the people with whom we interact.  We take a quick glance and if someone is wearing ragged clothing, we assume he/she cannot afford a new outfit.  Perhaps a new person you met did not give a good first impression.  It is easy to assume that their “less-than” best presentation is representative of him/her or of all future interactions.  Maybe because you read a bad review about a restaurant, so rather than experiencing it for yourself, you forgo an excellent dining experience.  As applied to interactions with our children, if a child arrives home and appears irritated, we assume our child did not have a good time at the other parents home.  Or, if our child is learning well at school, outsiders may assume the child is well-adjusted and dismiss other potential problematic areas.  Yet another example, your child fails to spend time with you for a weekend or two and you assume your ex-spouse is the culprit.  You fail to recognize the child’s own contributions to the perceived rejection.  To make assumptions is to be human.

If we recognize that assumptions are part of human nature, then we are able to become cognizant of our potential assumptions and vigilantly strive to fact-check.  Engaging in meaningful conversations with others, can mitigate a lot of unnecessary blame, burden, and erroneous conclusions.  With regards to relationships, besides examining our assumptions, another area of opportunity is understanding our anger.  Similar to making assumptions, addressing anger is another part of the human condition.  It is helpful to think of anger like an iceberg.  For example, if your teenager tosses their backpack on the floor and slams the door afterschool, we observe what many would identify as anger.  However, like an iceberg, there is more going on below the surface.  Anger can manifest as the expression of other feelings that are often unseen.  Anger can be external and/or internal.  As an example, one child may become sullen and remain in his/her room, while another child may act out by kicking a closet door.  A problem arises though when we assume that the cause of the child’s anger has been created by our ex-spouse.  Certainly, in some case of alienation, a child’s anger stems from the actions of a parent who blatantly ignores a court order.  However, we must recognize that at times it appears as though our ex-spouse is mistakenly the source of our child’s anger.  It is imperative that we distinguish that many feelings are below the surface, if we are to effectively address anger.  When we fail to consider other possibilities for a child or adolescents rejection, such as his/or her own role, further problems are created.

In the area of helping alienated children and parents, quick fixes and easy answers are often highly desired and sought.  This is clearly understandable, because when we as humans hurt, we want the pain to stop.  If we are cut we reach for a Band-Aid, but deeper cuts require stitches.  We realize that time can become the enemy of a child or adolescent who is defiant and becoming contact resistant.  In pursuing help with overcoming parent-child contact problems, it is easy to gravitate to the “latest and greatest” answer(s) to alleviate our child or adolescent from psychological abuse.  Again, much like the iceberg, there are many nuances in treating alienated families.  There are often times more going on beneath the surface.  Treating a deep wound with a Band-Aid simply will not work.  What can a parent do?

  • Awareness and education are the key.
  • Early intervention is vital.
  • Check your assumptions.
  • Realize that time can be both your friend and your enemy.
  • Educate significant others about alienation.
  • A Crisis can be an opportunity to connect with an alienated child.
  • Do not counter reject your child or adolescent (think of the anger iceberg – your child does not hate you).
  • Correct your child/adolescents distorted views of you – timing is everything.  Silence is not always golden.
  • Work through intense emotions.  Help your child or adolescent understand what is going on beneath the surface.
  • Realize that hurting people act out (content and happy co-parents do not engage in constant denigration – again think of the iceberg).
  • Refrain from name calling and labeling your ex-spouse.  No, not everyone is a sociopath, borderline, and/or a narcissist.
  • Parent-child contact problems are best treated when caught early and can be corrected sooner vs. later.
  • Realize that letting go does not mean giving up (sometimes parents need a respite).

If we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that sometimes our assumptions and preconceived notions are wrong, and therefore, our interpretation of events is incorrect. This causes us to overreact, to take things personally, or to judge people unfairly. ~ Elizabeth Thornton

Read More –>

Weeping for WilCo 3

Weeping for WilCo

Health Grades Dr Alissa Sherry Reviews

Vitals Dr Alissa Sherry Reviews