See all Posts Here: family-court-corruption.com/category/judge-linda-bayless/
ISSUE NO 1
THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO NOTIFY THE RESPONDENT OF IT’S INTENT TO ENTER FINAL ORDERS AND NO MOTION FOR FINAL ORDER HAD BEEN ENTERED.
ISSUE NO 2
THE TRIAL COURT RECEIVED PROPOSED FINAL ORDERS EX-PARTE FROM OPPOSING COUNSEL. THE TRIAL COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL FAILED TO INCLUDE RESPONDENT IN COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING ITS INTENT OR DESIRE TO ENTER FINAL ORDERS.
THE DAY AFTER THE TRIAL COURT RECEIVED THE EX PARTE PROPOSED FINAL ORDERS FROM THE PETITIONERS ATTORNEY THE TRIAL COURT SIGNED AND ENTERED THOSE FINAL ORDERS IN HER CHAMBERS WITHOUT A HEARING DEC 1ST, 2017.
ISSUE NO 4
THERE WAS NO NOTICE TO THE PRO SE RESPONDENT AFTER THE FINAL ORDERS WERE ENTERED.
ISSUE NO 5
TRIAL COURT HAS REFUSED MULTIPLE REQUESTS FOR A HEARING OR A DECISION ON THE BILL OF REVIEW THAT WAS FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AND THE JUDGE HAS STATED TO BOTH RESPONDENTS AND PETITIONERS ATTORNEYS THAT SHE IS GOING TO DENY THE BILL OF REVIEW WITHOUT A HEARING. THE TRIAL JUDGE HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT SHE WILL PUT THE RESPONDENT IN JAIL FOR 6 MONTHS AND ONLY ALLOW HER SUPERVISED VISITATION OF HER CHILD IF SHE CONTINUES TO PURSUE THE BILL OF REVIEW TO CORRECT THE ERRORS OF THE COURT.
ISSUE NO 6
THE TRIAL COURT IMPROPERLY DETERMINED THE PUNISHMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF THE CASE DEPRIVING APPELLANT OF SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS AND HER DETERMINATIONS OF THIS PUNISHMENT WAS FROM INFORMATION OBTAINED OUTSIDE OF ANY COURT SETTING AND WITHOUT A HEARING.
ISSUE NO 7
JUDGE BAYLESS REFUSED TO RECUSE HERSELF WHEN THERE WAS MORE THAN SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVE A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS AND UNQUESTIONABLE BIAS
See all Posts Here: family-court-corruption.com/category/judge-linda-bayless/
Parental Alienation: Allegations and the Favored Parent
Copyright © 2018 by Monika Logan, M.A., LPC, LSOTP
When a parent is identified as being the favored parent and accused of undermining the relationship between the other (rejected) parent and their child, the favored parent may feel discouraged and indicate that he/she is doing everything possible to promote the parent-child relationship.
The favored parent will often insist that he/she does not speak ill of the rejected parent, but rather encourages the child to communicate with the rejected parent. The favored parent may pronounce that the child’s rejection is a direct result of the rejected parent’s (in)actions and/or behaviors. The favored parent may also be inclined to attribute the child’s rejection to the rejected parent’s disposition and/or some other personality and/or behavioral flaw of the rejected parent. The favored parent may indicate that the child no longer wants to spend time with the rejected parent and that he/she cannot and should not force the child to do so.
What can a parent do? It is important for mental health professionals to realize that when working with families that the reason for rejection may be based in some fragment of reality. It is vital, however, that the favored parent does not mischaracterize the incident, behavior, and/or personality trait of their co-parent (the rejected parent). A common example is when a rejected parent has had an inappropriate response to anger during an isolated incident(s) in which he/she resorts to screaming and/or shouting at the child. Consequently, the child may have developed a fear reaction to the rejected parent. In addition, although the fear response by the child was observable in the past, it has now developed into a momentous concern by the favored parent.
After all, what can a parent accused of alienating behavior do, when his/her ex-spouse is “hot-tempered”? It is imperative that the favored parent does not perpetuate the child’s fear. It may become easy to claim that the rejected parent’s unmanaged anger problem is the cause of the child’s rejection, touting “See, his/her temper is why the child does not want anything to do with him/her.”
What can a parent do? Do not embellish your co-parent’s flaw, which only serves to further exacerbate fear(s).
When it comes to faults, rather than resorting to a myopic view, consider how the rejected parent’s flaw(s) were managed during the marriage/partnership. It is unlikely that your co-parent was flawless during the marriage/partnership. Perhaps the rejected parent’s temperament was an irritant during the marriage/partnership, however, it notably was not the reason for the relationship’s demise.
What can a parent do? Do not let the rejected parent’s temperament serve as weapon of rejection that can be used to sever the relationship with the child.
A common example observed by mental health professionals is a rejected parent who has worked outside of the home in order to provide the favored parent the opportunity to remain at home with the child. During the marriage/partnership, the rejected parent’s working hours were sometimes a frustration, however, he/she also earned an income that provided for many of life’s extras. Therefore, during the marriage/partnership the long hours were acceptable. When soccer games or dance recitals were missed on occasion, positive sentiments were made, such as telling the child that the rejected parent did not want to miss the event, and that he/she will attend next time.
What can a parent do? If the rejected parent went above and beyond to pay for activities and/or other extras during the marriage/partnership, do not use time as the weapon of choice after the marriage/partnership has ended by depicting the rejected parent as “absent” and/or “uninvolved” co-parent.
Sometimes, favored parents will verbally say they want what is “best for their child,” but will behave to the contrary. Here are some actions that may aid to offset and/or curtail allegations of alienation:
- Promote time with the rejected parent as valuable.
- Do not schedule activities that your child values during the rejected parent’s parenting time.
- Do not simply say you will cooperate, show that you will cooperate.
- Enforce your parental authority. If your child reports they do not want to spend time with the rejected parent, consider how you make your child eat dinner, go to school, and/or any other activity that your child may not want to engage in.
- Encourage the importance of family. Share positive memories with your child about the rejected parent’s extended family.
- Do not overact when your child tells you something negative about the rejected parent.
- Establish boundaries.
- Do not overschedule your child so that the child does not miss out on valuable time with the rejected parent.
- Seek help from a well-trained and experienced professional who is skilled in working with children, families, and resist/refuse dynamics.
Monika Logan is an owner and the Director of Texas Premier Counseling Services, PLLC (Texas PCS) located in Frisco, Texas. She specializes in Parental Alienation as well as troubled, damaged, and/or strained parent-child relationships. She provides counselling services for parents and their children in conflict and/or those struggling with issues related to separation and/or divorce. Ms. Logan offers Parenting Facilitation Services to help parents reduce conflict, and she helps repair parent-child relationship breaches as a Reunification Counselor.
Self-verified patient of Dr. Alissa Sherry – Posted on November 23rd, 2018
Let me first start off with saying that all of the following comments are my own opinions of Dr. Alissa Sherry: She is the worst psychologist that I have ever come across in my life and should have her ability to practice any type of psychological evaluations severely limited or revoked altogether. In my opinion it borderlines on malpractice at its highest level. Never ever allow her to evaluate you or someone you love no matter who appoints her, fight it to your death as she has the potential to destroy lives by her unprofessional assessments that seemed to be motivated by nothing more than money. This person could be your worst nightmare just look at the other reviews before this one, all rate her at the lowest level possible and basically say the same thing. Has an evaluation been court ordered of you for some reason? In my opinion, you will be risking everything by allowing her involvement with your case in any way shape or form. Go to your attorney, go to the court, go to anyone who will listen and do everything in your power to not allow her anywhere near yourself or a loved one. I personally would not even show up if ordered to. Do not take a chance with Alissa Sherry if you value your children, your marriage, your freedom, your life. Read the other reviews their not wrong in my opinion, proceed with caution and consider yourself warned…..
Self-verified patient of Dr. Alissa Sherry – Posted on September 13th, 2018
Dr. Sherry is not interested in your family or their welfare, only in making money in the divorce industry. Will not take both sides into consideration, is unfair and biased. Pitifully overpriced and underperforming.
Travis County Texas Family Court Corruption
Victims discuss Domestic Violence by Proxy, Abusive Litigation, Parents Being Unnecessarily Denied Access to Their Children, and other important topics:
Host Mike Lee and guests discuss the problems and challenges caused by legal and other professionals of the family law legal complex. They shared personal and professional experiences of the participants and reveal that more problems may be created rather than solved by these professionals. The discussion will suggest that financial gain and self-interest rather than the best interests of the children drive the reality of family law legal injustice. These complexities often negate the best interests of the children.
If you have issues that you feel are unjustified or corrupt please email email@example.com
Professionals of interest are:
Dr Alissa Sherry / Legal Consensus
Self-verified patient of Dr. Alissa Sherry – Posted on April 16th, 2018
This woman is a danger to good parents trying to raise their children in a Christian home. She never met me or my children and only looked at “evidence” provided by my ex-husband. She said what she was paid to say: that I am an alienator.
Self-verified patient of Dr. Alissa Sherry – Posted on March 16th, 2018
The ratings on all the sites speak for themselves! She is a danger to children and the family unit. Following what ever the Guardian ad litems suggest to them. Never interviewing the children or using collateral sources including other professionals involved. A total whitewash bias job. Also a fabricator and liar.
Interesting linksHere are some interesting links for you! Enjoy your stay :)
- Why Don’t Divorced Dads Turn To Each Other For Support Like Divorced Moms Do?
- Marital Compatibility: It’s About More Than Being “In Love”
- Vital Takeaways from Jeff Bezos’s High-Net-Worth Divorce
- Can Narcissists Really Move On Like Nothing Happened?
- Texas Court Includes Father’s Personal Injury Annuity in Resources When Calculating Child Support