Family Injustice: Kidnapped By The Court?
Sarah Leyva calls it kidnapping, but whatever you call it, what’s happening in Tarrant County family court should ring alarm bells.
source
The Mecca Murders
Judge Jane Gallina Mecca is one of the judges written about as a family annihilator. Family court judges across the country are removing critical protective orders filed on behalf of women who were threatened with mortal physical abuse by their tormentors. Those accused tormentors then found a path to alternate family court judges in their […]
The post The Mecca Murders first appeared on Foundation for Child Victims of the Family Courts.
Read More –>
California legislature passes bill aiming to protect children from abusers during custody disputes
Again and again, Ana Estevez warned officials that the man she was divorcing, Aramazd Andressian, was abusive and dangerous. Nevertheless, a Los Angeles County family court judge granted him shared custody of their 5-year-old son, Piqui.
One week later, on April 21, 2017, Andressian smothered the boy to death.
Engulfed by grief, Estevez, a former elementary-school principal, teamed up with her state senator, Susan Rubio, to craft legislation to prevent other children from being ordered into the custody of their abusers. This week, the California legislature passed that bill, known as “Piqui’s Law.”
After voting unanimously for passage on Wednesday, the state Assembly gave Estevez a standing ovation. Estevez also attended Thursday’s Senate vote, holding an urn containing Piqui’s ashes. That vote was unanimous, too.
The law, which will take effect unless it’s vetoed by the governor, establishes training on domestic and child abuse for custody judges and bars them from ordering children who resist contact with one of their parents into “reunification treatment” that cuts them off from the other parent.
Read more here.
10 Toxic Phrases Which Signal Narcissism
Narcissism is a personality disorder characterised by an inflated sense of self-importance, an excessive need for admiration, and a lack of empathy towards others. In this blog post, we will shine a light on ten toxic phrases often used by narcissistic individuals which can serve as warning signs of their behavior. Whilst a narcissist may not use the exact phrase, the core meaning in their communication will fit one of these models:
1. “I’m always right”:
This phrase reveals an unwillingness to consider the viewpoints of others and a belief that they possess superior knowledge or understanding. For instance, someone insisting they know better than an expert in a particular field without considering alternative perspectives. They could communicate this is non verbal ways as well such as laughing at your opinion or putting a hand up to stop you before you even start.
2. “You’re just jealous”:
Narcissists often deflect criticism or negative feedback by accusing others of envy or insecurity. This undermines valid concerns and dismisses any accountability for their actions. It is actually a projection of their own insecurities but they want you to feel inferior because that gives them a false sense of superiority.
3. “I deserve special treatment”:
Narcissists frequently demand preferential treatment or entitlements, disregarding the boundaries or needs of others. For example, one rule for them and a completely different rule for everyone else. This is often seen in Family Court where they will defy court orders but hold you to the tiniest detail.
4. “Everyone loves/admires me”:
A common phrase used by narcissistic individuals to exaggerate their popularity, dismissing any potential criticism or suggestions that their behavior might be off-putting to others. This is also a tactic of triangulation, aiming to make you feel you have to compete for their attention, and making you feel like the problem.
5. “I wouldn’t expect you to understand”:
By belittling the experiences or perspectives of others, narcissists display an inability to empathise and invalidate the feelings of those around them. This is another way to shut you down and prevent you from raising any issues with them.
6. “You’re being too sensitive”:
This phrase is commonly deployed to trivialise or dismiss another person’s emotions, suggesting that their reactions are irrational or exaggerated. It makes the victim question their sense of reality and has them doubting their feelings.
7. “It’s all about me”:
Individuals with narcissistic tendencies often monopolise conversations and make everything revolve around themselves, demonstrating a lack of interest in others’ experiences or opinions. This is often communicated through their actions which will be two fold – diminish the victim and raise themselves up.
8. “You’re lucky to have me”:
Narcissists perceive themselves as superior and indispensable. They use this phrase to remind others of their supposed value and create dependency. This is deployed to create jealousy and, coupled with triangulation, can create a feeling of paranoia in the victim, making them work extra hard to keep the narcissist’s attention. Often though it isn’t paranoia but instinct as narcissists do cheat on their parents, both emotionally and physically.
9. “I’m the best, no one can do it better”:
Narcissists frequently engage in self-promotion, boasting about their achievements and abilities to reinforce their superiority complex while undermining others’ strengths. This can be used in parenting to put the other parent down and make them feel worthless whilst also communicating to the children that they should only rely on the narcissistic parent.
10. “You should be grateful I’m even here”:
This phrase is used to manipulate and control others, making them feel indebted and guilty for the narcissist’s involvement in their lives. Sadly the narcissist will play on low self esteem and the vortex of self doubt and isolation they have created to keep the victim engaged in the relationship for longer than is healthy.
How many do you recognise?
The post 10 Toxic Phrases Which Signal Narcissism appeared first on The Nurturing Coach.
Judge’s having sex with their Marshal inside the courthouse!
Clark County Nevada
September 2, 2023
(VIPI) Veterans In Politics International was notified back in July, stating that Nadin Cutter Clark County Family Court Judge had to take a year off for maternity leave because she was having her Deputy Marshal Nicholas Boutos child.
Let me just add to this, Judge Cutter is married this alleged affair took place on the courthouse grounds.
VIPI immediately contacted Judge Nadin Cutter and her Deputy Marshal, who is now transferred out of family court to the Regional Justice Center. But all we received were crickets.
VIPI also contacted the Presiding Judge and Chief Judge, we received information stating that this is a personal related matter.
VIPI sat on this story until today when we received additional information from the infamous Las Vegas Law Blog echoing that Judge Cutter is indeed the mother of her Deputy Marshal child and this information is in her divorce pleadings.
Also adding that other judges within the Eighth Judicial District Court currently, have sex with their Court Appointed Deputy Marshal.
We discovered that this type of behavior has been going on for decades with former judges.
The Judge, Deputy Marshal, and the courthouse are all paid by taxpayers. This is a conflict of interest.
How can these judges judge us when they make bad judgments for themselves?
This is one of the reasons the Eighth Judicial District Court arbitrarily seals cases.
They make it difficult for pro-se-litigants to see their cases on the computer. This is a violation of the 14th Amendment, which talks about a fair judiciary. Especially litigants who live out of a 25-mile radius from the courthouse.
An attorney could just log into their portal and a litigant who represents themselves has to go to the courthouse, park, take a number, and wait in line. As if their time doesn’t matter!
How fair is this?
The court is trying to force litigants from self-representation and to hide their bad behaviors, so you can’t use it against them for re-election.
This violates the US Constitution and the Nevada Supreme Court decision that states “a courthouse is of public concern”. View the Nevada Supreme Court cases Jennifer Abrams vs. Veterans In Politics International and Marshal Willick vs. Veterans In Politics International.
Is the Nevada “toothless” Judicial Disciplinary Commission going to do something about this?
Veterans In Politics calls for a review of all Judge Harter’s cases, Autopsy report proves suicide, and addiction to antidepressants and pain pills!
Clark County Nevada
August 21, 2023
(VIPI) Veterans In Politics International was extremely critical of Family Court Judge Matthew Harter for several reasons:
- Hardly shows up to the courthouse about 2-3 days per week.
- Told several litigants that he is God!
- Allignate Parents from their children by holding their children hostage until the parent pays for a third-party court-appointed facilitator.
- Narcissistic attitude on the bench
- Mortgage and Bankruptcy fraud
- Perjury
VIPI file multiple Judicial Disciplinary Complaints and complaint to different state agencies including the worthless Attorney General’s Office, but it seems like these government agencies that were put in place to protect Nevadans is used only to protect the Judge.
VIPI requested several years ago that any candidate for a judicial seat should undergo a Psychiatric background check, but that fell on deaf ears. Now we have learned that Judge Harter had an addiction to pain pills and antidepressants. The coroner’s report suggested that Harter also committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest.
Harter destroyed thousands of lives while sitting as a family court judge!
VIPI is requesting that all of Judge Harter’s cases be under review.
Other related information on VIPI YouTube Channel”
www.youtube.com/results?search_query=judge+harter
A Parent In Fear For His Life When Pressing Complaints
A family court case in which a parent is fearful (literally in fear of his life) for pressing complaints is a case in Arizona. The protective parent was asserting his challenge successfully in the family court against an evaluator, a licensed psychologist who a 15-year-old young man had accused of masturbating in session. That young […]
The post A Parent In Fear For His Life When Pressing Complaints first appeared on Foundation for Child Victims of the Family Courts.
Read More –>
FamilY Court: KassenoFF Playbook
Last fall, Russian- Jewish immigrant mother Catherine Kassenoff’s Facebook page signaled a change for parents and kids trapped in the family court loop.. Rather than merely reposting occassional articles, Catherine stumbled across the troubling scene of Maya and her little brother Sebastian being taken from their Grandmother’s Santa Cruz home.
Watching private tranportation agents take two children by force was too much for her to watch. The former DOJ attorney reached out to Ann Marie Rosen, through a friend as a business mixer for JAMS, ADR and Signature Resolutions shareholders at Greenberg Traurig offices in Silicon Valley.
Catherine’s message was clear, ” We can’t neotiagate with terrorists”!
Catherine learned Ann Marie would be no help as Ann Marie and her husband, Jeff, were heavily invested in real estate connected to the secret club operating in San Jose at the Three Flames.
It was then that Catherine hatched her plan, recruiting lawyers, federal judges, activist, politicans, police officers, reporters and the wives of judges to help.
Missing her daughters and struggling with the reoccurance of her cancer, Catherine and her supporters changed the launch for the plan several times, ultimately deciding to launch a medical sucide once a federal lawsuit was filed. A federal lawsuit would be the only way to get the information into the public domain and finally shut the family court machine down permanently.
Catherine knew that her ex husband and his law firm, would never let her live to see her grandchildren. However, she executed the playbook , using the DOJ’s RICO investigation history, knowing it would take more than an indictment to break the machine in order to give her daughters any hope of a future outside the legal system.
She wanted her daughters to have peace she never had.
FamilY Court: KassenoFF 2.0
GreeLast fall, Russian- Jewishg immigrant, Catherine Kassenoff’s Facebook page signaled a change. Rather than merely reposting occassional articles, Catherine stumbled across the troubling scene of Maya and her little brother Sebastian being taken from their Grandmother’s Santa Cruz home.
Watching private tranportation agents take two children by force was too much for her to watch. The former DOJ attorney reached out to Ann Marie Rosen, through a friend as a business mixer for JAMS, ADR and Signature Resolutions shareholders at Greenberg Traurig offices in Silicon Valley.
Catherine’s message was clear, ” We can’t neotiagate with terrorists”!
Catherine learned Ann Marie would be no help as Ann Marie and her husband, Jeff, were heavily invested in real estate connected to the secret club operating in San Jose at the Three Flames .
It was then that Catherine hatched her plan, recruiting lawyers, federal judges, activist, polticans, police officers, reporters and the wives of judges to help.
Missing her daughters and struggling with the reoccurance of her cancer, Catherine and her supporters changed the launch for the plan several times, ultimately deciding to launch a medical sucide once a federal lawsuit was filed. A federal lawsuit would be the only way to get the information into the public domain and finally shut the family court machine down permanently.
Catherine knew that her ex husband and his law firm, would never let her live to see her grandchildren. However, she executed the playbook , using the DOJ’s RICO investigation history, knowing it would take more than an indictment to break the machine in order to give her daughters any hope of a future outside the legal system. She wanted them to have peace she never had.
Complaining Without Legal Action Will Only Make It Worse in Family Court
Public complaining about a case without legal action is a useless and frustrating activity that only imparts a sense of helplessness and impotence to the public. When one publicly complains about the injustices and cruelty of the court, if these complaints are not backed up by scholarly legal damages actions, federal due process violation complaints, […]
The post Complaining Without Legal Action Will Only Make It Worse in Family Court first appeared on Foundation for Child Victims of the Family Courts.
Read More –>