Mother of Young Boy Murdered by Father Advocates for ‘Piqui’s Law’

Aramazd Andressian Jr., known as Piqui, was smothered to death by his father after a trip to Disneyland in 2017. Now, five years later, his mother is now making sure the state protects children caught in a similar situation.

“The fact is victims and their children may be in greater danger during separation,” said California State Senator, Susan Rubio.

In the U.S., 851 children have been murdered by a divorcing or separating parent since 2008, according to the Center for Judicial Excellence, which is backing the bill.

Rubio introduced Piqui’s Law, SB 616, which would require judges and others involved in family law matters to participate in regular training on domestic violence and child abuse in its many forms.

Read more here.


The Godfather of Family Law: Episode 1 – Marshal Willick Exposed

The Godfather of Family Law: Episode 1 – Marshal Willick Exposed

3.39K subscribers
After being sent court footage that was supposed to be destroyed years ago in order to cover up the behavior of Nevada Family Law Attorney Marshal Willick, this exposes of the aforementioned infamous family law attorney, and his law firm, the Willick law group, was sent to me by investigative journalist Vem Miller. “The Godfather of Family Law” is a special episode of The Respondent and part of a multi-episode series that exposes the highly corrupt world of Family Law and the Cartel that runs it. Episode 2 coming soon! If you enjoyed this video, be sure to subscribe! ———————————— Follow Me On ———————————— All Platforms: Facebook: Twitter:


Timothy Treffinger said, “he is the CONSERVATIVE VOICE for the Clark County District Attorney’s Office”!

Timothy Treffinger said, “he is the CONSERVATIVE VOICE for the Clark County District Attorney’s Office”!

Clark County, Nevada

March 24, 2022


Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Timothy Treffinger candidate for Clark County District Attorney with special cohost Stephanie Phillips.

Treffinger hails from New Jersey and grew up conservative.

Treffinger has an undergrad in psychology and has a jurist doctorate in criminal law and social justice.

Triffinger worked for the Nevada Attorney General’s Office as a Prosecutor in three counties prosecuting cases against sex crimes and crimes against women he is now in private practice mainly doing criminal and family law.

Triffinger said he entered this race as the conservative voice because there is no other conservative voice in the race for District Attorney.

The host asked Triffinger about his 2017 arrest for the heroine.

Triffinger said that he received a public reprimand over a woman that lived with him that had a drug problem in Pahrump Nevada.

Triffinger said that the woman he lived with was also selling drugs and SWAT raided his home.

Triffinger said he was going back and forth from Pahrump to Las Vegas when this person lived in his home.

Triffinger said he was arrested for being the owner of the house.

Triffinger said he doesn’t use drugs or sell drugs but the media turned it into something that it’s not.

Triffinger said he pleaded to drug possession because the drugs were brought into his home by his then-girlfriend unannounced to him.

Triffinger also said the case is dismissed.

Triffinger said that the current District Attorney is not prosecuting shoplifters and this attitude only hursts the mom and pop stores.

The host asked about Domestic Violence (DV) when law enforcement is called to a scene they have to take one person into custody.

Triffinger said just because of a call of DV doesn’t mean they have to be arrested if there are no signs of DV.

Triffinger continues to say that DVs are constantly used as a weapon in family court.

Triffinger said that he will prosecute police officers for wrongful shootings.

Triffener said that we need a DA that is willing to lead to pick up a file and prosecute cases himself.

Triffinger was giving props to the DA for creating the Veterans Court Program.

The host chimed in and said that statement is incorrect, the current DA amended that Veterans Court Program after it was already created by Family Court Judge Jennifer Elliot and Veterans In Politics sponsored by Barbra Buckley Speaker of the Assembly, and sign into law of Governor Gibbons.

Please click on the link below to learn more about Treffinger:

Timothy Treffinger for Clark County District Attorney:

Please click on the link below to view the interview:

Timothy Treffinger candidate for Clark County District Attorney on the Veterans In Politics talk show


Releasing a Documentary on Family Court Corruption!

Releasing a Documentary on Family Court Corruption!

Clark County Nevada

February 6, 2022


Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Vem Miller documentary filmmaker.

Miller has done many documentaries exposing family court corruption on an international level.

Miller started directing music videos for several years, he then leaped into television programs.

Miller now is entrenched in making documentaries entitled “America Happens”.

Miller has several series on “America Happens” he said that he started to learn the laws, particularly on the family court to enhance his documentaries.

The host echoed that the Nevada Supreme Court came down with their ruling in the Jennifer Abrams Vs. Veterans In Politics International, Inc. that the courtroom is of public concern.

Miller said the family court doesn’t have a jury which is a constitutional violation and the judges and attorneys seal the case to avoid their gross criminal behavior to traffic children.

The host said that after watching one of Miller’s documentaries it was revealed that Case Workers received financial incentives to take children from loving parents. Each child is worth 35 thousand dollars in a 60 billion dollar industry.

The host said that many judges take the bench but don’t resemble the litigants before them, because some don’t have children of their own nor have never been married.

The host said that a jury trial should start with the Relocation of Children and Termination of Parental Rights. Either with a tribunal (3 Panel Judge) or a jury trial.

The host stated that leaving it up to one judge breeds corruption and bias.

Miller said that there is no due process in family court the judge’s discretion is not law. Doing this destroys the fabric of the law.

The host said that if judges in family court are ruling by discretion then they should change the qualifications of judicial candidates. By eliminating the practice of law and a State Bar license to practice law.

The host continues to say that anyone with common sense should be allowed to assume the family court bench. This would be the same qualifications Nevada has for municipal court justices with a population of fewer than 100,000 people.

Footnote: Nevada has no legal education or licensing requirements for municipal court justices, and only requires Justice Court justices to be a licensed attorney if they represent a county with a population above 100,000 people.

The host said that we shouldn’t continue to waste tax dollars for legislators to adopt laws if family court judges are going to continue to rule off of discretion.

Miller said that our state government knows exactly what type of problems exist in family court, but refuses to clean it up because they are making a lot of money in this industry.

The host said that when the family court Judge deems a litigant as vexatious they are violating that litigant’s 1st and 14th Amendment rights of our US Constitution.

Silencing a litigant by having them keep their mouths shut and refusing to accept any court filings violates their rights to a fair judiciary.

The host continued to say if they are making litigants vexatious because they are fighting for the love of their child. Then why can’t we do the same to attorneys that file crap just to see what sticks in the name of making a paycheck?

The host said that attorneys in family court know that they are committing perjury to it anyway and nothing ever happens to them. So they continue to lie!

The host continues to say if family court judges want to continue to do the jobs of criminal court judges, then they need to be a criminal court. This would able litigants to obtain a jury and if they can’t afford an attorney a public defender should be appointed to them. This is for any sentencing that requires incarceration.

“A jail cell doesn’t know the difference between criminal and civil contempt”.

The host brought up the fact that a civil court judge which is a family court judge doesn’t have the jurisdiction to order a litigant to take a drug test. The Nevada Revised Statutes states that only a criminal court judge has that jurisdiction.

The host continues to say that if the litigant appeal it would be overturned in the Nevada Supreme Court. But family court judges intimidate litigants and say that if they refuse to take the drug test the court would deem their drug test dirty and take their child.

In the Nevada Revised Statute, a judge can not use the child as a sword to develop power over a litigant. Isn’t this Parental Alienation by the court?

Many litigants don’t have the knowledge, time, or funding to appeal a case.

Miller said that many family court judges act on discretion and no evidence. The Rule of Evidence is out the window.

Miller said when a litigant speaks out against family court they lose their children and gets tossed in jail.

Miller also said that many judges give conflicting orders to litigants. This causes major confusion and discredits the litigant.

Miller said that nothing won’t change unless we do something about it. Many people don’t get involved until it personally affects them.

In a criminal enterprise, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Miller said he has 10 more Episoids coming out.

The host said that litigants need to find a way to make the law work for them.

The host continues to say that he has personally talked down litigants from doing stupid things to judges, opposing counsel,  and the opposing litigants on their cases. So many judges and community leaders should thank Veterans In Politics for being involved.

The host said the US Constitution is what separates us from other countries. Many countries want to be like us because of the Constitution and we continue to crap on it.

The host said if you are deciding to go to family court don’t do it. Get a mediator and a paralegal, compromise then submit it to the court for signature. Because if you go to family court thinking you have a winning case, you will be surprised!

See the latest video of Vem Miller:

America Happens – Episode 7 – “Family Law is a Genocide Machine”

Please click on the Vem Miller discusses the new documentary America Happens Episode 7 Family Law is a Genocide Machine VIP interview below:


Vietnam 5 tour combat veteran gets screwed-over by a Family Court Judge tells his story

Vietnam 5 tour combat veteran gets screwed-over by a Family Court Judge tells his story

Clark County Nevada

September 28, 2021


Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Wayne Conte Army Combat Veteran who did five tours in the country of Vietnam with special guest Cathie France and advocate for Conte.

When Veterans In Politics first started to take a hard look at family court in 2016, many asked us why.

Our response is the Clark County family court has constantly ignored the federal law that protects Veterans Service Connected Disability Benefits which cannot be counted as income and levy in any way. But civilians who never served will never understand that concept. Our veterans are not above the law, but they never asked to be disabled while serving in our country’s military.

We as a nation owe this debt to our veterans who put themselves in harm’s way to protect our freedoms and way of life.

Conte was given one of the worse family court judges Sandra Pomrenze and he paid the price.

A little history on Pomrenze she was caught telling a Black American litigant that she needs to cut her daughter’s “nappy hair”. Below is the link:

Judge Sandra Pomrenze’s comment about girl’s hair

Pomrenze is a biased and rude judge who loves to hear herself talk. Pomrenze denied Dr. Robert Medoff and his wife visitation of their granddaughter who they have raised for 8 years. This would be considered a “civil death”.

Judge Pomrenze knew that she wouldn’t survive reelection so she graciously decided not to run for reelection. Instead to our surprise, she was added to the Senior Judge List as a reward for doing such a great job on the bench. I think  NOT!

Senior judges handle about 20 percent of the total district and appellate caseload. By taking senior status, even if maintaining a full caseload, a judge creates a vacancy on the court, to be filled by the nomination and confirmation process of Senior Judges.

Now back to Conte:

Conte served over 20 years in the military and suffered from Agent Orange which gave him life-threatening cancer. Conte is now 100 service-connected disabled veterans.

Conte tells his story on how he was currently married to a Japanese woman and a Philippine woman fraudulently made a marriage certificate including him as her husband while he was stationed in the far east.

Conte finally divorced the Japanese woman and the Philippine woman shows up with a marriage certificate that was registered 9 days before the actual marriage date.

Conte said that Pomrenze discussed his case off the record in a closed-door meeting in the judge’s Chambers without his presence.

Conte said that he had no documentation to prove that he wasn’t married to the Phillippine woman and Judge Pomrenze accepted the fraud marriage document. Conte argued that the marriage certificate was registered 9 days before the marriage date and his military orders didn’t put him in the Philippines on the date of marriage.

The host asked if the case was sealed and France said that it is sealed but it’s completely deleted from the Clark County District Court website as if it never existed.

Completely removing a case is against the Nevada Revised Statute, Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedures, and Nevada Rules of Civil Procedures all states the following:

(c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited.  Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on-court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, the counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation “case sealed”; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal.

But judges and attorneys do it every day, Just asked Attorneys Marshal Willick and Jennifer Abrams it’s a normal practice to violate this rule without any consequences.

France said that Conte’s attorney received a document from the Philippine government indicating that the marriage between Conte and the Phillippine woman never existed and presented the document to the court.

France continued by saying that Pomrenze dismissed the document because the spelling of Wayne Conte’s first name was misspelled with an (i) instead of a (y).

France continued by stating that Conte’s attorney removed himself from the case 3 weeks before trial and Pomrenze never allowed Conte to find new counsel. Instead forced him into representing himself. Which is against our US Constitution’s 6th and 14th Amendments.

Conte had no idea how to represent himself. Pomrenze sets up Conte to fail and award his fraudulent wife $1,000 per month in alimony for 15 years. There were no children involved in this court case.

Conte’s new attorney never did an Appellee to the Nevada Supreme Court because he recently was disbarred. So the 30 days statute of limitations lapsed.

In September 2020 Conte filed a lawsuit in Federal Court against Pomrenze and the State of Nevada. The case is currently in discovery. Conte is suing for $100 million.

Conte refuses to pay the alimony because they weren’t married.

Conte first filed suit against Pomrenze in the Eighth Judicial District Court and was denied by Senior Judge James Bixler instead Bixler awarded the opposing attorney Richard Crane with the Willick Law Group $4900 in attorneys fees.

Crane was temporarily suspended from practicing law by the Nevada Supreme Court after he pleaded guilty to one count of sexually motivated coercion with a minor. Richard L. Crane a member of the Willick Law Group, which focuses on family law was sentenced to five years probation by District Judge David Barker.

Conte speaks about how Richard Crane became involved with his case on the opposing side. Conte indicated that all of his money is protected by federal law.

In 2019 Crane files a Writ of Execution to take $16,414.32 against Cont’s bank account which had Conte’s disability payment.

A Veterans Disability payment cannot be garnished unless it’s instead of military retirement. In addition, NRS 125.165 indicates that alimony can not be used from a veteran’s service-connected disability benefits. A veteran’s service-connected disability payment is the veteran’s sole property.

Conte filed a motion to stop the garnishment on his bank account. Pomrenze told Crane not to file the Writ of Execution against Conte’s bank account but Richard Crane violated the judge’s orders and did it anyway and never returned the money to Conte. No consequences were ordered on Crane.

Now the family court is attempting to put Wayne Conte on the vexatious litigant list. This will stifle his rights to defend himself and chill his free speech. A violation of his Sixth Amendment. How unconstitutional is this?

Conte said since the Willick Law Group has taken over the case as opposing counsel he had his apartment and vehicle broken into with documents scattered.

Conte said Crane has a restraining order against him because he wrote a letter to Crane saying that he will get fucked!

Conte is now looking for a reduction in alimony because the Phillippine woman is making 20% more than his disability payments.

Now Judge Mary Perry is on the case. Whoopee!

Please click on the link below:

Vietnam 5 tour combat veteran gets screwed-over by a Family Court Judge tells his story on VIPI talk

Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Crissy Peña on Day Trading and cryptocurrency.

Crissy Peña discuss financial investments on the Veterans In Politics Video Internet talk-show




DATELINE: LAS VEGAS, NEV., (Sept. 18, 2021).  Once upon a time, divorce laws required parties to prove “fault.”  Couples had to prove their spouses committed infidelities so horrific—that the court should dissolve the marriage.


In 1931, hoping to attract residents, Nevada enacted new divorce laws.  Nevada changed its residency requirements to six weeks and adopted a “no-fault” divorce.  Couples wishing to divorce could get un-hitched in just six weeks!—and they didn’t have to prove who cheated on whom!


With the advent of new divorce laws, divorce mills sprung up throughout Nevada.  Reno became the Divorce Capital of America.  Nevada ranchers cashed in on the divorce gold rush—they offered accommodations at “divorce ranches” where folks would stay for six weeks to establish residency.  In 1951, Rita Hayworth took up residency in Tahoe before filing for divorce.


“No-fault” divorce demonstrated the popular belief that unhappy spouses should be able to quickly end a soured marriage—and move on with their lives.  In 1969, California followed Nevada.  Then-Governor Reagan signed the Family Law Act, which created “no-fault” divorce for California couples with “irreconcilable differences.”


Sadly, Nevada has reverted back to a “fault” based system.  Nowadays, attorneys fight to show the ex is “at fault,” and if successful, their clients are eligible to be the “prevailing party,” which triggers an attorney’s fees award.


But there are no winners or losers in family court; after all, when parties go to family court, they seek no redress for wrongdoings.  Rather, they seek only to divide marital assets and/or possession time of children.  And, because nobody wins in family court, the notion of “prevailing party” makes no sense.


Where cunning attorneys can show the ex is “at-fault,” the attorneys’ clients are adjudged the “prevailing party”—which results in attorney’s fees.  This is the precise point where the corruption pathogen takes hold and begins to fester.  Next thing you know, attorneys from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, (“LACSN”), pretend to be “pro bono”—with an underlying expectation they’re gonna get paid—but only if they show the other party is “at-fault!”


Enter the notorious “faux Bono” lawyers—pretending to be do-gooders, supposedly donating time to charity cases—when in fact—they are money-grubbing, contingency fee lawyers—willing to wager they can show the ex is “at-fault”—and totally confident that crooked-ass judges will ensure the ex is “at-fault.”  (Get it?)


Take, for example, Vince Ochoa.  Once a LACSN team member, Ochoa is now a LACSN lackey.  Nowadays, Ochoa’s job is to ensure that LACSN attorneys get paid!—by hook or by crook!  Ochoa knows the scam.  Ochoa understands that attorneys cannot donate campaign funds to the bench unless they have disposable income; and so, Ochoa ensures the LACSN attorneys get paid!


Do LACSN lawyers ever represent BOTH spouses in family court?  No, of course, not!  Why?—because one LACSN lawyer would have to lose!—and go home empty-handed!  And no gold-digging LACSN lawyer will take a “pro bono” gig if there’s a possibility they might have to work for free!


If your ex is represented by LACSN, your crooked-ass judge will find YOU “at fault,” and your ex will be the “prevailing party”—because the LACSN lawyer must get paid.  Let’s say your ex LIES in open court and falsely accuses YOU of behaving badly.  Bamm!  The crooked-ass judge will believe your ex—guaranteed!  Family courts reward perjury.  Judges embrace the lies—because lies provide the necessary pretext to declare YOU “at fault.”  This means your ex is the “prevailing party,” and their LACSN attorney gets a handsome attorney’s fees award.


“Pro bono” is a Latin term meaning “for good” or “for charity.”  In contrast, “pro pecunia” is the Latin term meaning “for money.”  The “faux Bono” lawyer is NOT in the game for charitable reasons.  Getting paid is the sole objective.  The “faux Bono” lawyer is basically a contingency fee lawyer—a bus bench lawyer—like Saul Goodman—but with lower ethical standards.


Greedy attorneys and crooked-ass judges have effectively re-transformed Nevada law—from “no-fault”—back to “fault-based” divorce.  Just think—only sixteen (16) civil judges for the entire civil docket, but twenty-six (26) for family court.  Why?—because they need TEN extra judges to manage the bustling child kidnapping industry—which generates gazillions of dollars—and causes widespread misery more dismal, more costly, and more destructive than any blight, pestilence, or plague imaginable.  Sit down, Covid—the family court is the real scourge!


Back in the day, enlightened Nevada lawmakers had a vision—to un-hitch couples after only six weeks’ residency.  But those days are gone forever.  Today, divorce is big business.  Nobody gets out in six weeks.  If your kid is five, and your spouse files for divorce, the custody battle will last 13 years—until the kid turns 18—guaranteed.


Regular civil courts have fast-track procedures—to quickly dispo cases, but not so family court.  It’s a criminal cabal—where lawless and psychopathic judges choke the life out of couples, stranding them in family court quicksand—opening their veins and bleeding them dry—draining the family’s assets and stealing the children’s futures.


If you can’t afford a lawyer, and if your ex has a really good job, LACSN will represent YOU in family court—for FREE!  On the other hand, if you can’t afford a lawyer—and your ex is on disability or welfare, then forget it—LACSN won’t touch your case with a 39-and-a-half-foot-pole.  LACSN discriminates against the poor, (i.e., “intra-class” discrimination).  LACSN treats poor people differently from one another—based only on whether the ex has a paycheck that LACSN can garnish.


Where lawyers have the expectation of a payday—and they call themselves “pro bono,”—it’s inherently deceitful—a deceptive trade practice, [see NRS 598].  The venerable term “pro bono” must be reserved for attorneys with no expectation of pecuniary gain.  The moniker ”pro bono” must be unavailable to money-grubbing shysters.


We call for mandatory 50-50 custody legislation in Nevada!—and not just a rebuttable presumption of joint custody—but full, equal, and undivided joint custody—as Equal Protection demands.


It’s been said that equal parenting is integral for a child’s well-being.  If this is true, then the current system detriments children.  The system generates the most revenue by making parenting “unequal.”  Nevada is at a crossroads; we must decide—what’s more important?—the future of our children?—or Jennifer Abrams’ ability to buy another Porsche?


VETERAN in POLITICS INT’L (“Where Change Happens”)



How Animal Law Applies to Many Areas of Mainstream Practice

How Animal Law Applies to Many Areas of Mainstream Practice

A new book shows how laws protecting animals intersect with family law, criminal law, wills and estates, and professional liability.


Family Court Debate turns heated with local veterans group and family attorney!

Family Court Debate turns heated with local veterans group and family attorney!

Clark County Nevada

August 22, 2021


Veterans In Politics video internet talk show interviewed Louis Schneider a former Prosecutor and owner of Law Offices of Louis Schneider.

Schneider hails from Massachusetts has made Nevada his home.

Schneider has been practicing law for 17 years added that he has chosen family law over criminal law because in family law you can make a real difference, and in criminal law, most of your clients have done something wrong and you get them a soft landing.

Schneider has his own personal demons about the family court in Massachusetts.

Schneider said in family law he will not take a relocation case because it’s heartbreaking to take one parent from the other.

Schneider said in Nevada the judges have to reunite the parents by law, but we all know that’s not what happens.

Schneider said family court judges are the hardest working judges in the county.

Schneider kept repeating the judges look for the “best interest of the children”. The host repeatedly asks what does that means, but couldn’t get a straight answer.

The host brought up the issue that judges abuse their discretion, fail to follow the rule of evidence, and fail to follow Nevada Law and Federal Law. Schneider said he doesn’t see that in the courtroom.



The host wanted to know why the family court judge order litigants to get a drug test on pure allegations without any evidence to support the allegations.

The host pounded on the issue and said according to Nevada Law only a criminal judge can order drug testing of litigants and civil judges has no jurisdiction to make such an order adding that family court judges are civil judges not criminal.

Schneider added that former family court judge Cynthia Dianne Steel wouldn’t order a litigant to take a drug test because it’s a violation of their constitutional rights without probable cause and it’s a criminal court case matter.

Schneider said if you are ordered to take a drug test and you refuse, it’s deemed dirty.

The host said wait a minute if you stand up for your constitutional rights and the law, how is your lack of drug testing deemed dirty? The host said that judges are legislating from the bench. If they want to change the law they need to lobby the legislature for the law to change until then they need to follow the law.

Schneider said it’s the policy of the court. But here is the problem a court policy is not law!

The host brought up the 14th Amendment that gives you equal protection under the law adding if judges want to skirt the law they are no different than anyone else.

Schneider refuses to listen to the law by echoing the safety of children, in other words, you can violate the law if it’s for the safety of the children.

The host once again saying that is not the law, amend the law and stop violating the law. A family court judge cannot order a litigant to take a drug test.



The host suggested having a jury trial or a tribunal in family court when dealing with the relocation of children and termination of parental rights.

Schneider said that family court cases are complex and you can’t trust a jury to do that. The host pushed back and said wait a minute, in criminal court a jury decides prison or freedom, life or death, but a jury can’t make a decision on relocation or termination of parental rights, that is totally Ludacris!

Taking someone’s child is a civil death.

The host said one person that has the power to take a child from a parent breeds bias and corruption.

Schneider said a jury doesn’t have the understanding about family court, but yet a jury can decide if you live or die. We still can’t make sense from what Schneider is trying to say he is basically telling us that juries are idiots.

The host brought up the fact that the Constitution said that a parent has a right to parent their children.

The host stated that mediation is mandatory under Nevada State Law. Schneider said he believes mediation is the policy of the court, but yet some judges don’t order litigants to go to mediation before trial.



Rena Hughes former disgraced judge who was sanctioned by the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline and the only sitting judge to lose her election in the primary. Hughes alienated a child from her mother, conducted ex-parte communication, threatened the 11-year-old child with jail, denied court observers in the courtroom, and a tyrant in a black robe.

Bryce Duckworth storms off the bench like a toddler, has predetermined a case without hearing any evidence, doesn’t enforce his own court orders, demonstrates bias in the courtroom, and is a total hypocrite.

Charles Hoskin puts his friends in Hearing Masters job positions by ignoring the votes of the majority judges, destroyed hundreds of elderly Nevadans lives even a documentary entitled The Guardians on Amazon showed how this judge reamed havoc on Nevada residents, he has the most letters for Against in the Nevada Commission on Judicial Selection history when he was attempting to secure the appointment to the Nevada Appellate Court.

Duckworth and Hoskin need to join Hughes at The Abrams Law Firm.



Schneider said lawyers are paying for judges’ campaigns that breed abuse.

The host stated he has conversation from attorneys that feel threatened if they run against a judge, this is the reason why corrupt judges get a free ride by running unopposed.

The host stated that we have to find a way to remove bad judges by placing into law Remove or Retain. If a judge runs unopposed and Remove receives the most votes the seat becomes vacated, the Nevada Commission on Judicial Selection interviews candidates and sends three names to the Nevada Governor, from the three names Governor picks a person to fill the vacancy, and the following election year the person picked by the Governor runs for retention.



Schneider said pro se litigants receive a lot of leeway from judges.

Schneider was giving praise to the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada for their pro bono work. The host fired back and said before they take your case you have to be destitute out on the streets and if it’s pro bono work why does the judge order the other side to pay for the opposing parties’ pro bono attorney?

The host suggested the name pro bono needs to be changed to something else because pro bono means free.



Schneider said the Nevada State Bar beats up on one-man operations but refuses to go after established law firms.

The host brought up the fact that attorneys walk-off cases without notice abandoning the litigant in the courtroom and the judges allow this to happen. Schneider said that this behavior is against the law.

The host said if we keep turning a deaf ear and a blind eye to the corruption in our courtroom, it becomes normalized.

Schneider said he doesn’t see any corruption in the courtroom and he loves all the judges on the bench.

Schneider said that he takes offense when the host says the family court is corrupt.



Schneider said a family court judge cannot order the federal government to garnish your service-connected disability benefits.

The host said that the federal law protects a veteran’s disability benefits but some family court judges believe that they are entitled to take it from them.



The host said corruption has many faces, many items make a judge corrupt not just cash payments.

The host wanted to know why litigants are considered to be vexatious when attorneys are just as bad or in some cases worse but yet they are not considered vexatious by the court. In addition, this is a violation of their constitutional right to be heard in a court of law.

Vexatious is used to shut the litigant up!


In Closing:

Schneider said all it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing!

Click on the link below to watch the explosive and informative interview:

Family Court Debate turns heated with local veterans group and family attorney Louis Schneider


Like a Frog in Boiling Water: How Protective Parents are “Set Up” in Family Court

  The general public may not know the horrific state of the family courts. But this secret is well known to the experts who advocate and litigate for the clients of the Foundation for Child Victims of the Family Courts and the Foundation for Family Law in the Public Interest, a public interest / whistleblower […]

The post Like a Frog in Boiling Water: How Protective Parents are “Set Up” in Family Court first appeared on Foundation for Child Victims of the Family Courts.


Washington Post: When DV Victims Go to Court Without a Lawyer, Odds are Stacked Heavily Against Them

CJE Director Kathleen Russell recently testified in the Connecticut Legislature on Sen. Alex Kasser’s coercive control bill, where she focused on the tragic preventable filicide case of 7-month-old Aaden Moreno, and his protective mother, Adrianne Oyola. This mother’s plea to protect her son fell on deaf ears, when Judge Barry C. Pinkus refused to extend her restraining order against the boy’s abusive father, who then threw him off a bridge to his death in 2015.

Their case is now the subject of a Washington Post editorial. Kudos to the Washington Post for their ongoing series on the dangers of appearing “unrepresented” in the courts. According to a report from the California Chief Justice, 90% of family law litigants in California do not have the resources to hire an attorney, and thus are labeled “self-represented.”

Read more here.